The Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions Found in the Text Book for Health Students in Poltekes Padang: Bloom Taxonomy

Rahmi Mardianti(1), Yetti Zainil(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2021 Rahmi Mardianti

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v10i4.114962

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


Abstract The level of reading comprehension questions is very important for students especially English for Specific Purpose students. This research aims to find out the levels of reading comprehension questions and to investigate the English lecturers’ opinions related to the levels of reading comprehension questions based on Revised Taxonomy Bloom used in reading questions on English for Health course book. This study used a descriptive study that tries to portray the use of Taxonomy Blooms revise used in English course book for health students. This research used an English course book for health students entitled “English for Health” by Eka Susilowati and Agustin Widiani. The instruments of this research were observation checklist and interview guide. The observation checklist contained six components of the cognitive process of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. There were two findings of this research, they were: first, the levels of reading comprehension questions based on Revised Taxonomy Bloom used in reading questions on English for Health textbook was lower order thinking. Second, based on the English teachers’ opinion there were three adjustments that were made by the English teacher to the tasks in order to cater for higher order thinking process in the classroom. First, the teachers modify the questions based on the passage from other teaching material, the teachers make some questions which included higher level of thinking based on the passage that has been read before, the teachers give some projects to the students. Key words: Reading Comprehension Question, Bloom Taxonomy, English for Health Course Book

References


Alptekin, C. 1993. Target-language culture in EFL materials. ELT Journal 47 (2),136–143.

Alderson, J. Charles. 2000. Assessing reading. Cambridge: CambridgePress

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. New York: Longman.

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. 2010. Kerangka Landasan Untuk

Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, Dan Asesmen.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar

Anggreini. 2013. The Analysis of Reading Questions Based on Revised Bloom’s taxonomy in English Textbooks for Senior High Schools Grade X.Journal Online University of Malang.

Basturkmen, H. 2010. Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Cortazzi Martin And Jin Lixian. 1999. Cultural Mirrors: Materials and Methods in The EFL Classroom‖, in E. Hinkel (Ed) Culture in Second Language Teaching And Learning, New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 196-219

Cunningsworth, A. 1995. Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: MacmillanHeinemann ELT.

Duffy, et al. 2010. Difficulties with reading comprehension. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren & K. Apel (eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders. New York: The Guilford Press, 501-520

Eisner, E. 1987. Why the textbook influences curriculum. Curriculum Review 26 (3), 11–13.

Frankael, J. 1996. How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw Hill, Inc

Geoffrey. 2003. The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 3-18.

Harmer, Jeremy. 1983. The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman

Harmer, J. 2001. The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman

Harmer, J. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Pearson Longman.

Herzberg, F. 1993. The Motivation to Work (2nd ed.). NewYork: John Wiley & Sons Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. 1994. The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal 48 (4), 315–328.

Hutchinson, T., & Gault, J. 2009. Project 5: Teacher’s book (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McNamara, D. S. 2007. The importance of teaching reading strategies.

perspectives on language and literacy (the international dyslexia

association): 36-40. JELL Vol ... No... Serie ... September ...

ISSN: 2302-3546

Noprika. 2006. The Reading Tasks in English Textbooks for Junior High School Published by Erlangga by Using Cognitive Domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Unpublished Thesis of FKIP UMB.

Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (OALD). 2000. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

O’Neill, R. 1982. Why use textbooks? ELT Journal 36 (2), 104–111. Oxford Advanced Learner Dictionary.2000. New York: Longman.

Parera, M. F. 1983. Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of educational research, 62(3), pp. 307-332.

Paris, S. G., & Hamilton, E. E. 2009. The development of children’s reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffey (Eds.) Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 32-53). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

Prodromou, L. 1988. English as cultural action. ELT Journal 42 (2), 73–83 Robinson, K. 2013 The Element: how finding your passion changes everything.

Toronto, Ontario: Penguin Group. Saville-Troike, M. 1982. The ethnography of communication: an introduction. Oxford: Basic Blackwell.

Sheldon, L. 1988. Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal 42(2), 237–246

Skopinskaja, L. 2003. “The role of culture in foreign language teaching materials: An evaluation from an intercultural perspective”. In: I. Lázár (ed.), Incorporating intercultural communicative competence in language teacher education (pp. 39–68). European Centre for Modern Languages, Council of Europe Publishing. Retrieved from: http://archive.ecml.at/documents/pub123bE2003_Lazar.pdf

Urquhart, S. and Weir, C. 1998. Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. London: Longman

Wineburgh. 2001. Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 177 times
 PDF Downloaded : 84 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Rahmi Mardianti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.