An Analysis of Teacher’s Oral Corrective Feedback on Student’s Speaking Performance at SMPN 1 Bukittinggi

Regina Henner(1), Aryuliva Adnan(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of English Language Teaching

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v9i1.108287

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This descriptive research aimed to find out how do English teachers at SMPN 1 Bukittinggi give oral corrective feedback on student’s speaking performance, the ways of teacher giving oral corrective feedback and which types of oral corrective feedback are appropriate and inappropriate. The sample of this research was 4 English teachers at SMPN 1 Bukittinggi. The sample was taken by using total sampling. The techniques of data collection were observation and interview. The instruments used were observation checklist, field note, and audio recording. The data was analyzed based on the theory proposed by Ellis (2009). Based on the findings, it was found that English teachers at SMPN 1 Bukittinggi gave oral corrective feedback in different ways; direct and indirect. Each teacher also had different reasons about the ways they gave oral corrective feedback. Moreover, it was found that each teacher also gave different types of oral corrective feedback. After analyzing the data from the observation and the interview, the types of oral corrective feedback which are appropriate to the students are repetition, explicit correction, and paralinguistic signal. Meanwhile, the types of oral corrective feedback which are inappropriate to the students are recast and clarification request.


Keywords


Oral corrective feedback, speaking performance, appropriate oral corrective feedback types, inappropriate oral corrective feedback types

References


Boonkit, K. (2010). Enhancing the development of speaking skills for non-native speakers of English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1305–1309.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.191

Büyükbay, S., & Dabaghi, A. (2010). The Effectiveness of Repetition as Corrective Feedback. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.181-193

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054

Gay, L. R and Airasian p. Educational Research Competences for

Analysis and Application. New Jersey: Prentice hall Inc. (2000). Print.

Golshan, M. (2013). Corrective Feedback During Communicate Tasks : Do Recasts , Clarification Requests and Explicit Correction Affect EFL Learners ’ Second Language Acquisition Equally ? European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 559–571.

Herwanto, R. (2013). Factors That Cause Language Anxiety in the English. Yogyakarta State University.

Kumar, R. (2011) . Research Methodology (Third Edition). London. SAGE Publication.

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365

Noorezam, M., Teknologi, U., Cawangan, M., & Gudang, K. P. (2015). Verbal Corrective Feedback : Students. (2003), 1–11.

Nurhartanto, A. (2015). The Effect of Recast on Students’ Speaking Skill Based on Their Learning Strategies. Language and Language Teaching Journal, 18(02), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.2015.180202

Rassaei, E., & Moinzadeh, A. (2011). Investigating the Effects of Three Types of Corrective Feedback on the Acquisition of English Wh-question Forms by Iranian EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p97

Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Utami, A. N. S. L., & Aswandi. (2017). Error Analysis Of Students’ Speaking Performance In English Speaking Community. RETAIN, 5(3). Retrieved from https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/retain/article/view/20668

van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners’ Written Accuracy. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156(November 2014), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.2143/itl.156.0.2034439https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/retain/article/view/20668


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 727 times
 PDF Downloaded : 62 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of English Language Teaching

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.