ISSUES IN DESIGNING INSTRUMENT FOR AFFECTIVE ASSESSMENT BASED ON SCIENTIFIC APPROACH: ENGLISH TEACHERS’ REFLECTION

Ira Maisarah

Abstract


This research was describing the issues in designing instrument for affective assessment based on scientific approach. It is a reflection of English teachers in assessing the students’ affective in English language teaching. In English language teaching, an English teacher is not only forced to assess the students’ competence on language, but also their affective. Good affective is believed can support the students’ successfulness in learning. That’s why, the English teacher must assess the students’ affective frequently and continuously as an attempt to gain the progresses and the changes of students’ affective during the learning process. But, the English teachers have some problems in designing instrument for affective assessment based on scientific approach. So, it’s become the main issue in doing the evaluation for English classroom. For that reason, the researcher used qualitative method by giving depth interview with the English teachers in Junior High School in order to point out the issues. Moreover, it’s found that: (1) the instrument used by English teachers in assessing affective was still general, not based on phases in the scientific approach; (2) the indicator for scoring affective could not define the specific description for each type of affective; (3) the English teachers focused on one attitude to be assessed; and (4) the instrument used in assessing affective was a blank paper without any instruction, explanation, or table for noting the students’ scores. Finally, it is hoped that the English teachers can develop the instrument based on subject and approach used in English language teaching.

 

Key words/phrases:  Issue, Instrument, Affective Assessment, Scientific Approach, Teachers’ Reflection


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alwasilah, A. C. (2002). Pokoknya kualitatif. Dasar-dasar merancang dan melakukan penelitian kualitatif.Bandung: Kiblat Buku Utama.

Anderson, L.W and Bourke, S.F.. (2000). Assessing Affective Characteristics in the School (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Inc.

Bignold, W. and Gayton, L. (2009). Glibal Issues and Comparative Educationsi. British Learning Matters ltd.

Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company Inc.

Fishbean, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Gay, L. R., and Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: competencies for analysis and application (6th ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall inc.

Hosnan. 2014. Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Keblowska, M. 2012. “The Place of Affect in Second Language Acquisition” in Pawlak, Mirostaw (Ed.). Second Language Learning and Teaching: New Perspective on Individual Differences in Language Learning and Teaching (pg. 157-167). New York: Springer

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. 2015. Panduan Penilaian untuk Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP).

Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., and Masia, B.B. (1974). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.

Marzano, R.J.. (2006). Classroom Assessment and Grading that Work. Virginia: ASCD

Matheson C. and Matheson D. 2000. Educational Issues in the Learning Age. New York: Continuum.

Scott, D. 2001. Curriculum and Assessment. London: Ablex Publishing.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2003. Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Zohar, D. and Marshall, I. 2000. SQ: Memanfaatkan Kecerdasan Spiritual dalam Berpikir Integralistik dan Holistik untuk Memaknai Kehidupan. Bandung: Mizan.

Welner, K.G. and Chi, W.C (Eds.). 2008. Current Issues in Educational Policy and the Law. Charlotte: IAP.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.