Exploring the Effects of Collaborative Writing on Students’ Argumentative Essays and Their Perceptions about Its Implementation

Faradila Masuara, Utami Widiati

Abstract


This study aims at exploring the effects of collaborative writing (CW) on students’ argumentative essays and their perceptions about its implementation. It involved 42 students from a state university in Indonesia, grouped into two: 14 students of control group and 28 of experimental group. In the control group, argumentative writing tasks were completed individually; in the experimental group, these tasks were conducted in pairs. Writing quality was determined by a holistic rating procedure that included content, organization, grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics. Results of the study showed that CW had an overall significant effect on students’ L2 argumentative writing quality.  However, this effect varied from one writing aspect to another; the effects were significant for content, organization, and vocabulary, but not for grammar and mechanics. In addition, the findings also revealed that the students enjoyed the CW activitis, and most of them perceived CW positively as it improved their L2 writing performance.

 

Keywords: argumentative writing, collaborative writing, writing quality, students’ perception


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhowmik, H.R. (2018). Peer collaborative writing in the EAP classroom: Insights from a Canadian Postsecondary context. TESOL Journal, 10 (2).

Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (4), 40-58.

Dobao, A & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41 (4), 365-378

Hadiyanto, A.K. 2019. Students’ Collaborative Story Writing Project in an Extensive Reading Program. TEFLIN Journal, 30 (2).

Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 255–276.

Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 114–130.

McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32, 207–224.

McDonough, Vleeschauwer, & Crawford. (2018). Comparing the quality of collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual texts in a Thai EFL context. System, 74 (8) 109-120.

Shehadeh. (2011). Effect and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20 (3), pp. 286-298.

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173.

Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11, 143–159

Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275–288.

Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: Comparing individual and collaborative writing. In M.P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 157–177). London: Multilingual Matters.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, ZMA: Harvard University Press.

Widiati, U., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2006). The teaching of writing in the Indonesian context: The state of the arts. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(3), pp. 139-150.

Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, com¬plexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26, 445–466.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.