Comparative Analysis of Speech and Thought Presentation in Islamic Preach Between Zakir Naik and Syeikh Khalid Yasin

Eeng Zahara(1), Hermawati Syarif(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang 

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2019 E-Journal English Language and Literature

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v8i4.106319

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


Through stylistics analysis, there are several stylistics devices which can be used by the linguists in order to develop that study whether in fiction or non-fiction text. In this paper, the theory of speech and thought presentation which is introduced by Leech and Short (1981) is used in analyzing the Islamic preach of two different speakers, Zakir Naik and Syeikh Khalid Yasin. Moreover, there are two research questions which come in this research (1) What are the modes of speech and thought presentation used in the Islamic preach of Zakir Naik and Syeikh Khalid Yasin and (2) what are the differences and similarities of speech and thought presentation modes used by this two different speakers? Therefore, the purpose of this reserach is to find out the modes of speech and thought presentation used by Zakir Naik and Khalid Yasin, and also to find out the similatities and differences between them. This is a comparative qualitative study because it is not in statistical data and it compares the modes of speech and thought presentation in eight video transcriptions to see the similarities and differences between two Islamic preachers. The results of the study show that (1) the modes of speech and thought presentation used by this two preachers is mostly similar in which the high number occurance is narrator’s presentation of voice and (2) it is found that Zakir Naik mostly used speech presentation rather than Khalid Yasin.


Keywords


Speech and thought presentation, Stylistics, Islamic preach, Zakir Naik and Syeikh Khalid Yasin

References


Fairclough, N. (2003). Analazying Discourse: Textual Anlysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.

Leech, G., & Short, M. (1981). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose (1st ed.) London: Longman.

Leech, G. (2007). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose (2nd ed.). London: Longman.

Leskiv, Alina. (2009). The Literary Phenomenon of Free Indirect Speech. Zeszyt Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. 60/2009

Noorgaard, Nina, Beatrix Busse, and Rocio Montoro. (2010). Key Terms in Stylistics. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Richardson, Hannah. (2018). Characteristics of a Comparative Research Design. Retrieved from https://pjlor.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/chapter-4-draft-2011-04-20.pdf. Leaf Group Education. Retreived on February 1st, 2018.

Semino, Elena. (2004). Representing Characters’ Speech and Thought in Narrative Fiction: A Study Case of England England by Julian Barnes. Northern Illnois University. Vol. 38 No. 4 Pp 428-4451,2004.

Semino, E., & Short, M. (2004).Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge.

Simpson, Paul. (2004). Stylistics. USA: Routledge.

Verdonk, P. (2002). Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 791 times
 PDF Downloaded : 211 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 E-Journal English Language and Literature

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.